Source: arXiv · cs.CVView original ↗
Copyright remains with the original source. This site only collects, translates, or reformats the material.
What happened
arXiv:2608.12714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world object detection operates under ambiguous supervision, where unlabeled regions may correspond to missing annotations of known objects or genuinely unknown categ
Analysis and impact
从任务背景来看,传统目标检测通常假设训练集标注完备,所有未标注区域都被默认为背景。然而在开放世界设定下,这一假设不再成立:模型既要识别训练中见过的类别,又要对未见过的物体保持警觉,避免将其误判为背景或已知类别。该论文将“稀疏标注”与“开放世界”两个条件结合,意味着训练数据中不仅存在未知类别,连已知类别的标注本身也是不完整的。这种双重不确定性更接近自动驾驶、安防监控、机器人视觉等实际部署场景中的数据状态。
与同日发布的其他 arXiv 论文相比,这篇工作属于计算机视觉方向,而相关素材中的几篇则集中在自然语言处理领域,例如关于大语言模型自我反思机制的受控消融研究What Drives LLM Self-Reflection?、AI 智能体规则遵从性的框架与情境分析Why Do AI Agents Break Rules?,以及法律本体学习中的语义保持测量On Measuring Semantic Preservation in Legal Ontology Learning等。这些素材与本文主题无直接技术关联,仅作为同日学术动态的背景参考。
由于摘要篇幅有限,目前只能确认该研究将开放世界目标检测置于稀疏标注的框架下进行探讨,并强调未标注区域语义的歧义性。至于作者提出了怎样的模型架构、损失函数或评测协议,以及实验在哪些数据集上验证、与哪些基线方法对比,原文未提供。对开放世界检测或弱监督学习感兴趣的读者,可进一步查阅论文全文获取方法细节。
References
- arXiv · cs.CV ↗
- What Drives LLM Self-Reflection? A Controlled Ablation of Uncertainty Routing in Armed Conflict Forecasting ↗
- Why Do AI Agents Break Rules? How Framing, Context, and Social Signals Shape Compliance ↗
- On Measuring Semantic Preservation in Legal Ontology Learning ↗
- Comparative Analysis of Multilingual Pre-trained Models for Nepali Automatic Speech Recognition ↗
- Reliability-Aware Sexism Detection: Combining DPO with Annotator Agreement and Token-Level Confidence Scoring ↗
Original source text
arXiv:2608.12714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world object detection operates under ambiguous supervision, where unlabeled regions may correspond to missing annotations of known objects or genuinely unknown categories. These challenges have been addressed separately in Sparsely Annotated Object Detection (SAOD) and Open-World Object Detection (OWOD). In practice, their co-occurrence remains an open problem. To address this problem, we introduce Sparsely Annotated Open-World Object Detection (SA-OWOD), a new task that jointly considers sparse supervision and the presence of unseen categories. We propose Dual-Perspective Object Discovery (DPOD), a unified framework that jointly models unlabeled known and unknown instances via two complementary mechanisms. The Known Target Recovery Module (KTRM) recovers supervision for unlabeled known instances and explicitly regularizes the feature space to separate known and unknown representations. Complementarily, the Dual-Disagreement Target Generator (DDTG) identifies reliable unknown candidates through cross-view semantic inconsistency. By integrating these modules, DPOD resolves contradictory supervision signals caused by ambiguous unlabeled regions. As a result, it prevents misclassification between known and unknown objects and stabilizes the decision boundaries. Experimental results on sparsely annotated open-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing open-world detection methods, particularly in detecting unknown objects.