사실 흐름
해설과 영향
这一争议可以追溯到双方围绕《堡垒之夜》支付渠道的冲突。Epic Games 一直主张，开发者应当有权引导用户通过外部链接完成交易，从而绕开 Apple 最高 30% 的抽成。Apple 此前的立场是外部链接交易不受其抽成约束，但本次新提案显示，Apple 正在调整策略，试图为这类“绕开内购”的交易也建立收费依据。来源
从法律层面看，该案的焦点在于法院此前对 Apple 反转向条款的裁决如何落地。美国法院曾要求 Apple 允许开发者告知用户外部购买选项，但并未明确 Apple 是否以及如何对这类交易收费。Apple 此次提出的结构，本质上是在遵守法院命令的同时，尽可能维持其从应用内经济活动中获取收入的能力。Epic Games 则可能认为，这种收费安排变相削弱了法院裁决的实际效果。来源
目前，关于该收费结构的具体比例、适用条件以及是否会被法院接受，原文未提供更多细节。相关素材中亦无直接补充信息。考虑到双方此前已多次就支付规则对簿公堂，此次新提案很可能只是这一漫长法律拉锯中的又一轮交锋，后续仍取决于法院对 Apple 合规方案的审查结果。
참고 자료
출처 원문
In a new filing in its long-running legal dispute with Epic Games, Apple has proposed a structure that would allow it to collect fees on digital purchases made via external links that don't use the company's in-app purchase system. Epic has already responded, saying that Apple's request is "far outside of the bounds" of the court's guidance.
Right now, Apple cannot take a commission on external purchases after California district court judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled in April 2025 that found the company "willfully" didn't comply with her 2021 Epic Games v. Apple injunction. However, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel said that Apple …