事實脈絡
解讀與影響
从产品演进来看，机器人割草机经历了从埋线式到无线导航式的技术迭代。早期产品依赖预埋边界线来划定工作区域，安装成本高且灵活性差；新一代机型则借助 GPS、视觉传感器和雷达等技术实现自主建图与路径规划。The Verge 在评测中提到，这类设备在平整、开阔的草坪上表现稳定，能够按设定频率持续修剪，减少人工推草机的使用频次。
但“可用”与“省心”之间仍有明显差距。原文指出，机器人割草机并非“设置后即可遗忘”的设备：用户需要处理障碍物识别、复杂地形通过性、刀片维护以及雨天或湿草条件下的作业限制等问题。如果忽略这些环节，设备可能反复碾压同一区域或在边界处留下未修剪的死角，反而增加返工成本。此外，不同品牌在避障算法和爬坡能力上的差异，也会直接影响实际使用体验。
从市场角度看，机器人割草机的普及仍受限于价格和安装门槛。The Verge 的结论倾向于：对于愿意投入初始设置并接受一定维护责任的用户，这类产品已经能显著降低草坪打理的工作量；但对于期望完全“无人化”的消费者，当前技术尚未成熟到可以彻底放手。原文未提供具体测试机型或对比数据，仅从使用体验层面给出了整体判断。
參考來源
來源原文
From left, Segway, Roborock, Dreame, Husqvarna, and Mammotion automowers lined up to do battle with my lawn. | Photo: Jennifer Pattison Tuohy / The Verge
Robot lawnmowers are finally good enough to take a lot of work out of maintaining a yard, but they’re still not set-it-and-forget-it machines. If you don’t want these autonomous cutting machines to tear up your lawn or go roaming in your neighbors’ yard, you’re still going to need to keep an eye on them. But with some oversight, they can take a big chore off your hands.
This summer I tested five bots on my flat, three-quarter-acre, coastal South Carolina property with sandy soil, centipede grass, and lots of trees. Things went much better than last year’s trials and tribulations, thanks to huge improvements in navigation and maneuverability. Basically, they stopped getting stuck. My lawn has never looked better, and my spouse — who had sworn off robot lawnmowers after a user-error injury — is now a convert. His riding lawnmower has been idle for over a month.
The consistency of robot mowers is impressive. Running daily and shaving just millimeters at a time, these mowers have created a noticeably lusher lawn. I walked out on it barefoot this morning — something I’ve never done before. The best part is that they work quietly around the clock, without bothering my pets, the wildlife, or the neighbors. I also love the professional-looking lawn lines they make.
图片 What’s better
The key upgrades this year are network RTK navigation, fallback navigation systems, and improved all-wheel-drive to tackle rougher terrain.
RTK — real-time kinematic positioning — is the satellite positioning tech most automowers switched to over the last few years as they’ve ditched boundary wires. It uses stationary ground-based reference stations (antennas), along with GPS, to provide very precise location data, down to a centimeter or two. It’s used for surveying, drone navigation, and anything that needs that fine level of precision.
Every mower I tested, apart from the Lidar-based Dreame, comes with its own RTK antenna that needs to be installed in your yard with a clear view of the sky; trees, a neighbor’s house, or your own roofline can all block the signal. In my previous testing, I didn’t get a single RTK mower to run successfully in my backyard, where I have very spotty GPS coverage.
图片 This new crop all now offers NetRTK as an option. This taps into a network of existing RTK reference stations through a cloud connection, and requires a Wi-Fi or 4G connection on the mower. Most worked out of the box without me needing to install the antenna, but you’ll need to check if your house is covered, as coverage varies.
RTK mowers now also use a secondary navigation tech such as lidar or vSLAM to keep on track when the signal drops. This improvement in navigation, plus bigger, more capable machines, meant I no longer spent my summer dragging confused mowers out from under oak trees.
What still needs work
However, automowers are far from perfect.
These are autonomous machines with blades, and leaving them to their own devices comes with risks. One spent three days methodically destroying a patch of my lawn before I noticed. Another took out two outdoor extension cords. Several models dug sandpits in bare patches, and another tried to climb up a small tree.
Obstacle detection is better across the board, but it still has a long way to go. Hoses, cables, and cars are still a challenge — my family now knows to check under the wheels before driving away.
No one has really solved gates yet, either (although they’re trying) — I still have to manually open mine to let the robot mow the full property. And, while every manufacturer currently advertises NetRTK coverage as free for the lifetime of the device, there are obvious downsides to relying on a cloud service to mow your lawn. Finally, automowers are still expensive, and I have concerns around long-term durability.
图片 Like their siblings, robot vacuums, there are myriad models on the market now; the right one for you will depend on the size of your yard and your landscape. To find the mower that worked best for me, I tested four top-of-the-line models with specs capable of tackling my challenging terrain and large expanse of my backyard: The Husqvarna 420 IQ ($3,299), Mammotion Luba 3 AWD 3000 ($2,799), Navimow X430 ($2,499), and the Dreame A3 AWD Pro 2500 ($3,099.99). I also tried the entry-level Roborock RockNeo Q110H ($1,299) on my front lawn, which is more like a standard suburban lawn.
Also like robot vacuums, robot lawnmowers fall under the new FCC robot ban, so while existing models can continue to be sold and supported in the US — including all the models reviewed here — the fate of new models is in question.
The robot I’d get for my yard Segway Navimow X430 *Navigation: RTK, vSLAM / Yard size: up to 1 acre / Cutting: 0.75” to 4” height, 17” width (dual discs) / Terrain capabilities: 4WD, zero-turn wheels, 84% slope / Theft features: Lift and out-of-zone alarms, GPS anti-theft, PIN / Weatherproofing: IP67 / Connectivity: 4G (1 yr free then $32.90 a yr), Wi-Fi, BLE / Warranty: 3 yrs *
图片 Where to Buy:
- $2499 at Amazon
- $2499 at The Home Depot
$2499 at Segway The Segway Navimow X430 ($2,499) is by far the best mower I tested. This 60-pound beast looks like Darth Vader’s dog, and was the only mower I tested that didn’t get stuck once. Its 4WD wheels combined with impressive suspension rolled through the potholes, over sticks and rocks, even small tree branches. It navigated around my chickens and across the tall, uneven transition from my front yard to back yards — it was the only bot that could mow both in one trip (with the gate open).
This video shows the Segway tackling a sandpit and executing a 90-degree turn without damaging the sod.
It uses a combination of RTK, vSLAM, and vision-based tech to navigate, and it covered my entire property without once getting lost or stuck. It features impressive “xero-turn” maneuverability enabling it to pivot smoothly with no lawn damage. Its dual-disc, 17-inch cutting width covers more ground, and it was able to mow most of my backyard in under three hours — nearly twice as fast as most competitors. I really liked the remote-control mowing feature, which was handy for tidying up the edges of the lawn and more sensitive areas such as around flower beds.
The Segway’s speed does mean a few blades go untrimmed, and its rain sensing relies on weather data from the internet, which meant it often didn’t mow because it predicted rain that never came. Setting up the NetRTK was a bit tricky, mostly because I had to put the charging station in an awkward spot to connect to the GPS (it can’t be under an awning or up against a building as the mower also needs a clear view of the sky).
A good lidar-based alternative Dreame A3 AWD Pro 2500 *Navigation: Lidar, AI vision (camera-based) / Yard size: 0.62 acre / Cutting: 1.2” to 3.9” height, 15.8” width (dual discs) / Terrain capabilities: AWD, zero-turn wheels, 80% slope / Theft features: Lift and out-of zone alarms, GPS anti-theft, PIN / Weatherproofing: IPX6 / Connectivity: 4G (3 yrs free), Wi-Fi, BLE / Warranty: 2 yrs * 图片 Where to Buy:
- 2499.99 at Amazon
2499.99 at Dreame The Dreame A3 AWD Pro 2500 ($3,099.99) is the best option if you can’t rely on RTK. Its lidar and camera-based navigation performed nearly as well as the Segway in my backyard, only getting stuck a couple of times. It doesn’t need a clear view of the sky, so you can place it anywhere, and its sliding edge-cutting deck worked slightly better than the Segway’s EdgeSense feature in my testing. (Beware, it’s set to a fixed 1.2-inch minimum).
But in my testing, lidar was the least reliable navigation tech, and sometimes the A3 declared the job complete when it wasn’t. Lidar robots do best in a fenced-in yard, as they can more easily get lost and wander off into your neighbors’ yard, something that never happened with the RTK robots.
The Dreame performed as well as the Segway when mowing, but its turning mechanism did churn up dirt where there was less grass cover.
While the Dreame rarely got stuck, its turning mechanism wasn’t as smooth as the Segway, and it dug several sandpits in various spots where there was no grass. I do like its “Garden Guardian” mode that uses the camera as a roaming security guard, and it can also identify when people cross its path and warn them that it’s working. It’s been mildly hilarious watching it surprise the heck out of dog walkers passing by the front yard.
An expensive but reliable option for yards with no trees Husqvarna Automower 420 IQ *Navigation: EPOS (RTK), radar / Yard size: 1 acre / Cutting: 1” to 4” height, 9.4” width (single discs) / Terrain capabilities: 2WD, large wheels, 45% slope / Theft features: Out-of zone alarm, GPS anti-theft, PIN / Weatherproofing: IPX5 / Connectivity: 4G (free for life), Wi-Fi, BLE / Warranty: 4 yr mower, 3 yr battery * 图片 Where to Buy:
- 3144.37 at Amazon
$3299.99 at Husqvarna Husqvarna’s Automower 420 IQ ($3,299) is a good option for a standard yard. It has the longest warranty (four years), the easiest app and controls, and a modular design for longevity. It’s 2WD, but its large wheels tackled uneven terrain well. It requires an RTK antenna and has the option of cloud-based RTK (in some areas), but its backup navigation for satellite dead spots requires installing physical boundary wire.
I tested this in my neighbor’s yard using the physical RTK antenna, as they have fewer trees and clearer views of the sky. It navigated well, but it uses radar for obstacle detection and has no camera at all. This meant it wasn’t as good at dodging objects as the others, and ran into the bushes once and tried to climb a small tree.
图片 But if you have a large, uncomplicated, tree-free yard, it’s a good option thanks to Husqvarna’s broad support network, free-for-life cellular connectivity for both theft and NetRTK (should you need it), and impressive performance.
More reliable navigation, but spotty software Mammotion Luba 3 AWD 3000 *Navigation: Lidar, RTK, AI-vision (camera-based) / Yard size: 0.75 acre / Cutting: 1” to 2.7” height, 15.7” width (dual discs) / Terrain capabilities: AWD, 80% slope / Theft features: Lift and out-of zone alarms, GPS anti-theft, physical key / Weatherproofing: IPX6 / Connectivity: 4G (3 yrs free), Wi-Fi, BLE / Warranty: 3 yrs * 图片 Where to Buy:
- 2239 at Mammotion
- 2239 at The Home Depot The Mammotion combines all three wireless navigation types — RTK, lidar, and vision — making it ideal for properties with spotty GPS coverage like mine. But it’s less nimble than the other AWD models thanks to lower ground clearance and weaker suspension.
图片 Its turning mechanism also tore up a couple areas of my garden, particularly a shaded area near my neighbors’ sprinklers, which stayed damper than other spots. Mammotion has acknowledged this issue, telling The Verge “We’ve identified that a recent update to the turning logic caused some unwanted results. The mower turning too sharply might tear up the grass to some extent, especially when the ground is wet and slippery, or the grass isn’t very thick.”
They’ve deployed several software updates to address this, but we should all be wary of relying on software updates to fix fundamental problems with an expensive lawnmower.
A budget option for smaller yards with or without trees Roborock RockNeo Q110H *Navigation: RTK, vSLAM / Yard size: 0.25 acre / Cutting: 0.8” to 2.4” height, 8.7” width (single disc) / Terrain capabilities: 2WD, 45% slope / Theft features: Out-of zone alarm, GPS anti-theft (with optional module), PIN / Weatherproofing: IPX6 / Connectivity: Wi-Fi, BLE (4G sold separately) / Warranty: 2 yr * 图片 Where to Buy:
- 999.99 at Amazon
$1299 at Roborock The $1,299 Roborock RockNeo Q110H is my budget pick. This rear-wheel-drive mower was impressive on my flat, treed front yard, although its lack of all-wheel-drive meant that the occasional large tree root stopped it in its tracks. That, and its more limited range, is why it’s half the price of other mowers here. It offers RTK and vSLAM navigation, with the option of antenna or NetRTK.
The RockNeo is remarkably similar to the Segway Navimow i100N I tested last year, with a few upgrades, including better camera-based obstacle detection, steeper slope navigation (up to 45%), and a wider cutting blade. It can also be used for manual remote-control mowing and has a built-in edge-cutting feature, although there’s the option of an edge-cutting add-on module, which I haven’t tried.
Edge cutting is still very much a work in progress for all mowers. Some do well straddling the edge, but if you have a fence or delicate boundary, that won’t work. Companies are trying all sorts of solutions — including special attachments. Ecovacs Goat A3000 Pro Lidar looks to be the most promising, thanks to a side-mounted string trimmer. But for now, you should plan to keep your manual trimmer handy.
图片 Robot mowers have improved significantly over the last 18 months. Advances in navigation have solved my main pain points from my last round of testing, and bigger, beefier bots are now better at navigating the varied terrain of American yards. Today, the right bot will maintain your yard beautifully with minimal effort. While they still need oversight and the occasional rescue, and they haven’t solved every problem, they do take a lot of the work out of maintaining your yard.
Photos and videos by Jennifer Pattison Tuohy / The Verge