來源:The Verge查看原文 ↗
原文著作權歸來源方所有,本站僅作收錄、翻譯或格式整理。
媒體:0 則已核驗,1 則僅保留來源
事實脈絡
解讀與影響
这篇评论的核心并非技术本身,而是技术使用者与创造者之间对“生活”理解的错位。作者认为,马克·扎克伯格等科技领袖所构建的元宇宙或人工智能愿景,往往试图将人类体验数字化、效率化,却可能忽略了生活中那些无法被算法优化的部分——比如攀岩时身体的真实感受、制作一张略显笨拙的励志海报所承载的个人情感。原文未提供扎克伯格对此的直接回应,但文章暗示,当科技巨头试图定义“如何生活”时,他们提供的答案可能并不比一只AI生成的走扁带熊更贴近生活的本质。
从更广的视角看,这种关于技术与人性的讨论并非孤例。就在同一天,麻省理工学院新闻办公室发布了一篇关于博士生杰西卡·弗莱的报道,讲述她从百老汇舞台转向核科学实验室、全力追寻暗物质的故事来源:MIT News。弗莱的经历恰好提供了一个对照:无论是探索宇宙中最难以捉摸的粒子,还是在峡谷间走扁带,人类对未知的投入和热情本身,或许才是技术难以复制的核心。
參考來源
來源原文
Recently, a man I was rock climbing with told me about how he'd used AI to make a motivational poster for himself, which he'd hung on his bedroom wall: a bear, walking a slackline over a canyon, holding a sign that said, "Do cool shit." I made what I hoped was a polite noise. What reaction was this man looking for? He probably hoped someone, maybe me, would say it was cool or inspiring. It seemed I was not the first person he'd told about this poster. "You know, it's funny," he said to me. "No one ever says anything about it."
I have been thinking about this now for several days. There's a sort of turducken of things that I find off-puttin …